Geronimo lineup
Who is interested in Geronimo? Obviously a lot of people, I don't know too many people actually using it apart from using it as maven dependencies for the J2EE API's.
I attended Bruce Snyders presentation on ServiceMix and found that one interesting because I have been reading up on Mule a little bit so I attended to get a comparison. I am currently also working on a project where we are on a good way to actually implement small parts of an ESB so the topic is really interesting. With that said, I am not necessarily an advocate of adding a dependency to a third party library just because it contains an out of the box implementation of something I can do with 10 lines of javacode.
Managing 100 different and possible incompatibilities might be just much of a nightmare as writing the 1000 lines of code that those frameworks help me to replace.
The panel lineup of the Geronimo Panel Discussion are:
- Bruce Snyder
- Matt Hogstrom
- James Strachan
- Aaron Mulder
- David Jencks
although OSGI is not supported in Geronimo, one of the reasons is complexity the panel claims.
Why should we select a commercial vendor instead of going for an Open Source alternative, and actually end up paying for a J2EE server, here are some of the points from the panel:
- Commercial vendors often provides entire suites of products that may complement the J2EE server
- Support and product roadmaps
- Performance and scalability
- Wheter the product has ben subject to rigorous testing (is this a way of saying that the testsuite accompanying Geronimo could be improved?)
- Service pack/fixpack approach, most commercial vendors provide support for incremental updates
No comments:
Post a Comment